Mantab One

The winding wars: A definitive guide to automatic movement technology

The subtle, almost imperceptible weight on your wrist holds a universe of intricate engineering. It’s a quiet ‘heartbeat’, a sweeping second hand that glides rather than ticks, powered not by a battery but by your own life’s motion. This is the magic of the automatic watch movement, a marvel of micro-mechanics that has captivated enthusiasts for centuries. But beneath this romantic exterior lies a fierce battleground of innovation, a conflict we call the ‘winding wars’. This is a relentless competition among watchmakers to create movements that are more accurate, more durable, and longer-lasting than ever before. The front lines are drawn between established workhorses and cutting-edge in-house calibers, with new materials and radical designs constantly shifting the balance of power. In this guide, we will journey through the history of this fascinating technology, dissect the mechanics that make it possible, meet the major players in the industry, explore the modern innovations defining today’s movements, and ultimately, help you choose your champion in this ongoing war of winding.

The heart of the matter what is an automatic movement

At its core, an automatic or self-winding movement is a mechanical engine for your wrist that harnesses kinetic energy. Unlike a quartz watch which relies on a battery and an electronic circuit, or a manual-wind watch which requires you to turn the crown periodically to tighten the mainspring, an automatic watch winds itself. The key component is a semi-circular piece of metal, called a rotor or oscillating weight, that is mounted on bearings. As you move your arm throughout the day, gravity and momentum cause the rotor to swing back and forth. This spinning motion is transferred through a series of gears to the mainspring, a tightly coiled ribbon of metal that stores potential energy. The mainspring then slowly and consistently releases this energy through a gear train to the escapement. The escapement is the true brain of the operation, delivering precise impulses to the balance wheel, which oscillates at a constant rate. This rhythmic oscillation, typically 6 to 8 times per second, is what governs the timekeeping of the watch, moving the hands forward with that signature smooth sweep. The appeal is twofold; it’s a sustainable, battery-free technology and it represents a deep connection between the wearer and the machine, a partnership of motion that literally brings time to life. It’s a small, self-sufficient world of springs and gears, a testament to human ingenuity.

A brief history of self-winding innovation

The concept of a self-winding mechanism is surprisingly old, predating the wristwatch by over a century. Horological historians debate the true inventor, with credit often given to either Abraham-Louis Perrelet or Hubert Sarton in the 1770s. These early designs were for pocket watches and used a ‘pedometer’ style weight that would bob up and down with the wearer’s movement to wind the mainspring. While ingenious, these early systems were often fragile and inefficient, remaining more of a novelty for the wealthy than a practical solution. The true revolution came with the rise of the wristwatch in the early 20th century. In 1923, a British watchmaker named John Harwood patented the first commercially successful automatic wristwatch. His clever ‘bumper’ system used a weight that would pivot in an arc, bumping off springs on either side to wind the movement. It was a huge leap forward. However, it was Rolex that truly perfected and popularized the technology. In 1931, Rolex introduced its ‘Perpetual’ movement, which featured a central rotor that could rotate a full 360 degrees. This was far more efficient than the bumper system and became the industry standard that is still used today. This innovation cemented Rolex’s reputation for creating robust, reliable ‘tool’ watches and set the stage for the modern era of automatic timekeeping, laying the groundwork for the competitive ‘winding wars’ that would follow decades later.

The major players ETA, Sellita, and the rise of Miyota

For much of the 20th century, the Swiss watch industry operated like a collection of specialized artisans. Some companies made cases, others made dials, and a few key players specialized in making the movements that powered a vast number of brands. The most dominant of these was ETA SA, now part of the Swatch Group. For decades, ETA movements like the 2824-2 and the 7750 chronograph were the undisputed workhorses of the industry, powering watches from brands ranging from Tudor and Breitling to countless smaller microbrands. They were, and still are, known for their reliability, serviceability, and solid performance. However, as the Swatch Group began restricting the supply of ETA movements to competitors, a void appeared in the market. This void was eagerly filled by Sellita. Sellita was once a contractor that assembled ETA movements, so they knew the designs intimately. When ETA’s patents expired, Sellita began producing their own ‘clone’ movements. The most famous is the Sellita SW200-1, a near-identical copy of the ETA 2824-2. This allowed brands outside the Swatch Group to continue producing watches with reliable, Swiss-made movements. At the same time, Japanese manufacturers made significant inroads. Citizen’s movement division, Miyota, and Seiko Instruments Inc. offered compelling alternatives. The Miyota 9000 series and the ubiquitous Seiko NH35 became famous for offering incredible reliability and performance at a highly competitive price, fueling the explosive growth of the microbrand scene and proving that quality movements were not an exclusively Swiss domain.

Product Recommendation:

The in-house advantage prestige, performance, and price

While workhorse movements from ETA, Sellita, and Miyota offer fantastic value and reliability, the highest echelons of watchmaking are dominated by the concept of the ‘in-house’ movement. An in-house caliber is a movement that a watch brand designs, manufactures, and assembles entirely by itself, without relying on third-party suppliers. This is a monumental undertaking, requiring immense investment in research, development, and specialized manufacturing facilities. So why do brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega, and Grand Seiko go to such lengths? The primary reason is control. By creating their own movements, they have complete control over the design, specifications, quality, and supply chain. This allows them to create movements that are perfectly tailored to their watches and to push the boundaries of horological performance. An in-house movement is also a powerful statement of prestige and technical prowess. It separates a true ‘manufacture’ from a brand that simply assembles components. For consumers, this often translates to superior performance, unique features, and the exclusivity that comes with owning a piece of proprietary technology. However, this advantage comes at a cost. Watches with in-house movements are almost always significantly more expensive. Furthermore, servicing can be more complex and costly, as the watch often must be sent back to the manufacturer instead of being serviced by a local watchmaker who may not have access to the specific parts or training.

Modern battlegrounds materials, power reserve, and frequency

The contemporary ‘winding wars’ are being fought on several technological fronts. One of the most significant is the use of advanced materials. Magnetism is a traditional enemy of mechanical watches, capable of disrupting the delicate balance spring and ruining accuracy. To combat this, brands like Omega and Rolex have heavily invested in anti-magnetic components. Omega’s use of a silicon balance spring (known as ‘Si14’) and other non-ferrous parts in its Co-Axial Master Chronometer movements has resulted in watches that are resistant to magnetic fields up to 15,000 gauss, a level far beyond what one would encounter in daily life. Another key battlefield is power reserve. For decades, a standard automatic movement held about 38 to 42 hours of power. This meant if you took your watch off on Friday evening, it would likely have stopped by Monday morning. Today, a new standard is emerging. Tissot’s Powermatic 80 movement, developed by ETA, offers an impressive 80-hour power reserve. Similarly, Tudor’s in-house Kenissi movements boast a ‘weekend-proof’ 70-hour power reserve. This is achieved through more efficient mainsprings and escapements. Finally, there is the battle of frequency. A movement’s frequency, measured in Hertz (Hz) or vibrations per hour (vph), determines how many times the balance wheel oscillates per second. A higher frequency allows for a smoother sweeping second hand and can lead to greater theoretical accuracy. While 4 Hz (28,800 vph) is a modern standard, brands like Zenith with its legendary El Primero and Grand Seiko with its Hi-Beat calibers push the envelope to 5 Hz (36,000 vph), showcasing their mastery of high-speed mechanics.

Choosing your champion how to select the right movement for you

Navigating the world of automatic movements can feel daunting, but choosing the right one comes down to understanding your own priorities. Are you looking for a reliable, no-fuss daily watch that can be serviced easily and affordably anywhere in the world? If so, a watch powered by a proven workhorse like a Sellita SW200-1, ETA 2824-2, or Seiko NH35 is an outstanding choice. These movements have been produced in the millions, their quirks are well understood, and parts are widely available. They represent the pinnacle of value and dependability in the watch world. Perhaps you appreciate a higher level of finishing and a smoother second hand sweep. In that case, stepping up to a watch with a Japanese Miyota 9015 or a Swiss ETA 2892-A2 would be an excellent move. These are slimmer, often more refined movements that signal a step up in quality. If modern features are your priority, you should seek out the new generation of movements with extended power reserves. A watch with a Powermatic 80 or a Kenissi caliber offers the practical convenience of a 3-day power reserve, a tangible benefit for anyone who rotates through several watches. Finally, if you are a connoisseur who values cutting-edge technology, brand heritage, and horological prestige, an in-house movement is your champion. Whether it’s the anti-magnetic wizardry of an Omega Master Chronometer, the robust engineering of a Rolex caliber, or the artistic precision of a Grand Seiko Hi-Beat, an in-house movement represents the very best a brand has to offer.

Conclusion a timeless fascination

The ‘winding wars’ are far from over; they are a sign of a healthy and vibrant industry. This constant competition, from the affordable and robust to the luxurious and innovative, ensures that the art of mechanical timekeeping continues to evolve. We’ve seen the battle lines shift from the basic need for self-winding functionality to modern conflicts over materials science, energy efficiency, and chronometric precision. The result is a golden age for watch buyers. There has never been a better time to own an automatic watch, with incredible options available at every conceivable price point. Whether you choose a dependable Swiss workhorse, a high-value Japanese caliber, or a technologically advanced in-house manufacture movement, you are participating in a tradition that spans centuries. There is no single ‘best’ movement, only the movement that is best for you, your lifestyle, and your budget. In a world saturated with digital screens and disposable technology, the enduring appeal of a tiny, self-powered mechanical engine on the wrist is a powerful reminder of the beauty of lasting craftsmanship and the timeless, captivating rhythm of a beating heart made of metal.

Related Article